In her Substack post, Maria Konnikova unpacks the WSOP docu-series drama that resulted in all episodes being pulled due to the use of AI. She also touches on the drama that started earlier in the week, with PokerListings writer Sara O’Connor admitting to using AI to help finesse her articles.
The fallout raises questions about transparency and consent in creative storytelling.
Two Keatings were embroiled in the WSOP AI dubbing scandal. Both Alan and Alex have accused the WSOP and GG of manipulating their voices and words during episodes aired as part of the 'No Limit’ docu-series.
As compensation, Alex is now calling for the WSOP to cover the Paradise buy-in for all affected players.
Tbh, it doesn’t sound like a terrible idea.
Wasn’t going to watch the whole thing (a 2003 poker documentary that apparently is worth the watch), and then we meet Simon Trumper from Guildford, England.
I’m totally sold. Roll the tape.
Honestly can’t get enough of Lappin’s writing style. 👏
To find out what he’s alluding to, check out his article over on VegasSlotsOnline.
David Lappin takes to VegasSlotsOnline to give his take on the recent WSOP drama.
In case you missed it, WSOP’s latest documentary, 'No Limit,’ is drawing heat for using AI-generated audio to misrepresent poker pro, Alan Keating.
When you’ve got the temerity to post an 882-word diatribe on how the poker community is creatively bankrupt, when you’ve got the gall to claim that your next project is going to be a game-changer in the space, when you have the audacity to declare that you’ve turned “poker sessions into cinematic experiences,” then you sure as hell better not deliver a four-hour snoozefest that exploits its subjects, putting words in their mouths when it suits your “narrative.” Yet that is exactly what Dustin Iannotti has done with “No Limit,” a poorly rendered mess of a docuseries that lacks conflict, drama, and a coherent premise.
It is not a good look.
Why is this giving me BBC-Trump-Panorama edit vibes?