PokerStars on FanDuel has been paying out substantially more in tournament prize money than players have contributed through buy-ins, with two major series since its US relaunch generating sizeable overlays.
Whether this is a deliberate investment in gaining market share, a miscalculation of player demand, or a result of how tournaments and satellites have been scheduled, the sums involved deserve attention from the online poker industry.
When PokerStars on FanDuel launched its $5 million guaranteed Ignite Series shortly after relaunching in the US market, most tournaments in the schedule failed to attract enough entries to meet their guarantees. Despite the shortfalls accumulating throughout the series, the operator did not reduce its guarantees.
According to pokerfuse’s calculations, the Ignite Series generated more than $1 million in overlays, with PokerStars on FanDuel honoring the advertised guarantees and covering the shortfall.
The operator’s second major series, the September Dynasty Series, held last month, produced a similar outcome. Although its guarantees were reduced from those of the Ignite Series, the schedule still promised $3.5 million in prize money, one of the largest in the regulated US online poker market. Once again, tournament after tournament fell short of its guarantee, and the operator continued to honor the advertised amounts.
As per pokerfuse’s calculations, the September Dynasty Series generated approximately $687k in overlays. The series awarded just over $3.5 million and drew 31,665 entries. The three NLHE Main Events alone had an overlay of nearly $150k. The $300 Main Event drew 860 entries, falling short of its $350,000 guarantee by $109,200. The $50 version saw 1,250 runners but fell short by $18,125, while the $1,500 High Roller had a shortfall of $21,650.
Two consecutive series with massive overlays are difficult to dismiss as an isolated occurrence. PokerStars on FanDuel has committed to large tournament guarantees and, so far, has been willing to absorb the cost when participation falls short.
- Special Launch Welcome Offer: up to $1000 deposit bonus for all players!
- Free $30 in Spin and Goal tickets at signup for a chance to win $1M
- All new software and three-state online poker network
PokerStars September Dynasty Series By the Numbers:
- Guarantee: $3,489,000
- Tournaments Held: 100
- Prize Pool Awarded: $3,510,826
- Total Entries: 31,665
- Overlays: 86/100
- Overlay Amount: $686,740
FanDuel Can Afford to Play Big
One possible explanation is that FanDuel is treating these overlays as an investment in acquiring market share rather than simply as losses on individual tournaments.
FanDuel is one of the largest online gambling companies in the US, with an established sportsbook and casino business behind its poker offering. That financial backing gives it the capacity to absorb costs that could be harder for other poker operators to sustain, particularly when trying to establish a presence in a competitive market.
PokerStars on FanDuel returned to the US market using iPoker’s platform with an established brand, but it still needs to attract players to its new platform and persuade them to play there regularly. Large tournament guarantees can help achieve that. They give players a reason to consider a site, offer the prospect of big prize pools, and can help build a tournament schedule that attracts repeat participation.
Keeping those guarantees intact, even when fields fall short, may be part of that effort. Players who see advertised guarantees consistently honored have an incentive to keep entering tournaments, while the operator gets another opportunity to build traffic and establish regular tournament participation.
The overlays from the Ignite and September Dynasty Series could therefore represent the price of competing for market share. FanDuel may be prepared to absorb short-term losses if it believes that larger fields, greater player retention, and increased activity will eventually justify the expense.
That does not mean the decision is necessarily paying off. Nor does the size of the overlays prove that they were planned as a customer-acquisition expense. But FanDuel’s financial backing makes it easier to sustain an approach that would be considerably more difficult for an operator with fewer resources.
| Ignite Series | September Dynasty Series | |
|---|---|---|
| Dates | Apr 18 – May 4 | Sep 12 – 28 |
| GTD | $5M | $3.5M |
| Tournaments | 90 | 100 |
| Overlays | $1,063,762 | $686,740 |
Could There Be Another Explanation?
There are also less deliberate explanations for the repeated shortfalls. The guarantees may have been set too high relative to the number of players currently active on the platform, particularly if participation following the relaunch has not developed as quickly as expected.
Satellite scheduling could also have played a part. Satellites help feed players into larger buy-in events, and their timing, availability, and structure can influence how many entries those tournaments ultimately attract. If the satellite schedule does not adequately support the target events, or if demand has been overestimated, even an ambitious series can struggle to meet its targets.
It is also possible that FanDuel is still learning how its new US player pool responds to different tournament formats, buy-ins, and schedules. The first two major series provide useful information about demand, and future schedules may reflect what the operator has learned from them.
The migration to the new platform could also have contributed to the shortfalls. Some players may not have made the transition from the previous platform, while others may need time to adjust to the new software and its features. If a portion of the existing player base has yet to return, or has not taken to the new platform, that could help explain why tournament fields have struggled to meet their guarantees.
These possibilities should not be confused with evidence of negligence. The overlay figures alone cannot establish whether the guarantees were deliberately set at loss-making levels, whether the operator misjudged demand, or whether scheduling decisions contributed to the shortfalls. PokerStars on FanDuel has also honored the guarantees it advertised, ensuring that players received the promised prize pools.
Nevertheless, the scale and repetition of the overlays raise a question worth asking: how much is FanDuel prepared to spend to establish PokerStars in the US online poker market?
An overlay of around $700,000 would be substantial even for an international online poker market drawing players from multiple countries. In a ring-fenced US market where the player pool is limited to three states, it is an especially large sum.
The next major series will offer another opportunity to see whether participation improves, whether the operator adjusts its guarantees, or whether FanDuel continues to cover the shortfall. Whatever the explanation, the online poker industry should be watching.
