Merge is Suffocating Traffic With its Fixed Limit Rake Structure Merge is Suffocating Traffic With its Fixed Limit Rake Structure

Some poker players sing a requiem for Limit Hold’em. They think it is dead. It is not. About 20% of all poker hands played are still of the Fixed Limit variety of Texas Hold’em. But only a small portion of these are played on the Merge network. Why? Because they’re strangling the games with high rake.

Games would flourish if it weren't for the Merge's rake, argues Paul Hoppe

Sites like PokerStars understand that Fixed Limit needs a different rake structure from No Limit. Due to the nature of the game, a typical player will see more than three times as many flops in Limit as in No Limit. (In a sample of 90k hands, I saw the flop 31% of the time in Limit compared to 7.7% in No Limit.) Under a no flop/no drop policy, this means a Limit Hold’em player gets raked three times as often as a No Limit player.

$1/$2 Fixed Limit Rake Comparison

The solution is to increase the increments by which rake is taken. In a $1/$2 game, that means not raking the pot until it hits $5. In a $2/$4 game, it means not raking until the pot hits $20. This allows the Limit Hold’em rake to fall closer in line with No Limit. Merge is raking the pot as soon as it hits $.20. The chart below illustrates the difference in rake between Merge and its US-friendly competitor, Cake. Notice how Cake rake moves up in steps while Merge rake follows a smoother line.

$2/$4 Fixed Limit Rake Comparison

The pale yellow area shows the extra rake that Merge is taking. Does this mean that they’re making more money than they would with a lower rake? No. The rake is so high that playing Limit Hold’em below $10/$20 is an unsustainable endeavor. They’re suffocating their traffic by preventing anyone from flourishing. There are many high-volume players who won’t play on Merge because of the rake. If they cut rake by 30% and double their traffic, they could increase profits by 40%.

Limit Hold’em should be a goldmine for online poker sites. Edges are thinner than in No Limit, so recreational players last longer. They can’t blow off their whole stack in one hand. And the typical loose style of a recreational player is less costly in Limit, since proper play involves playing many hands and seeing lots of showdowns. Being stubborn is an asset, not the liability it is in No Limit.

I sincerely hope Merge listens to its customers, because they have the opportunity to be a leader in online Limit Hold’em. They have quality software and reasonable deposit and withdrawal options for US players. If they make their rake equally reasonable, Limit players will flock to their tables.

This article was originally published on Free Association under the title, 'Why Merge Should Lower Their Fixed Limit Rake.’